Wired Magazine has a great roundup of the viral parodies of Muntadar al-Zaidi throwing his shoes at Bush.
My quick thoughts on the al-Zaidi phenomenon: Read the rest of this entry »
Wired Magazine has a great roundup of the viral parodies of Muntadar al-Zaidi throwing his shoes at Bush.
My quick thoughts on the al-Zaidi phenomenon: Read the rest of this entry »
A random observation with under 10 hours to go to the verdict in the Sean Bell case:
A helicopter — I’m pretty sure it was an NYPD helicopter — was circling my area in Bedford Stuyvestant, Brooklyn, shining a spotlight down onto the direction of the projects.
They watch and await. We are watching as well.
anti-oppression, criticism, critique, ideas, praxis, SDS, theory
Is “Anti-Oppression” enough?
In Commentary, SDS, Uncategorized on April 24, 2008 at 6:00 amAnti-oppression. It’s this buzzword I’ve only recently encountered due to heavy involvement with SDS. I have to say, I have an almost constitutional dislike for the modern-Leftist fixation with “anti” formulations (anti-[fill in the blank]ism”), perhaps due to an early love of Elements of Style, but also because I find that it reflects the modern ideology of neverending resistance struggle without revolution — for a sharp discussion of that, here’s Zizek.
Anti-oppression, as it’s been put before SDS at least, is a catch-all term for the praxis built around political/popular education against forms of systemic oppression — white supremacy, patriarchy, heterosexism, and capitalism — for the sake of having the male, pale, and stale Left confront these things as they show themselves in both society and in the movement (as a reflection of society, however distorted). It gets translated into organizations usually running down a laundry list of oppressions they oppose, and the stances they take up in opposition (i.e., “anti-capitalist, anti-racist, anti-patriarchy, anti-heterosexist” etc.)
Read the rest of this entry »